🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive losing against lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Regarding System and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and then discard him for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.