🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.