🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy worked, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Route

The foreign minister is walking a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the sites had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in some form if negotiations reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the forum, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be settled by combat operations. He said the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith hard to restore.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had consistently tried to dictate their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the final resolution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, rules and principles must be respected."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will get a response in the identical language."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."